Lebanon, Syria, Iran and the Coming Imperialist Re-Division of the World
The sheer brutality of the butchery of civilians by Israeli WMD – bombs and fighter planes provided by the United States – on Lebanon is firstly a warning to the rest of the world from the United States: 'accept US global domination, or else’; and secondly, it is the beginning of a serious struggle for all-out control over Middle-East, Caspian Basin and Central Asian oil and gas. It is not the puppet Israel but the US itself who sets the tone of this purposefully brutal war, a war which opens up a qualitative change in US aggression and inter-imperialist conflict, a period that will draw the whole world into intensifying horrors and suffering. At the same time this new period opens a large window for the dramatic re-appearance of world-wide mass class struggle bringing workers and youth back into the centre-stage of global politics.
( Full story here )
( Full story here )
3 Comments:
While it's always useful to portray alternative views and I do agree with some points, particularly that of the Hezbollah-Israeli war showing signs of it being a proxy war, I think there are limits. Articles like this may lead to an accusation that "oil peakers" rely on alarmist passions, rather than evidence.
Yes, we're headed down a dangerous one-way road. I have been reading articles on this site (The View from the Peak) for nearly two years, I have studied the issues, and have taken steps to insulate myself from the impacts of $75/bbl (and higher) oil.
A while ago, The View from the Peak had great articles about the state of oil reserves in Saudi Arabia and Mexico that has only recently come to the consciousness of mass media. This is the kind of research I prefer.
This article, while awakening and brutally honest, comes from a voice whose aim is the destruction of the benefits of the modern West. Its presence usurps the serious, fact- & research-based message of Peak Oil.
Thanks for that feedback.
What I am attempting to do at this blog is to post the links to the news/artcles that I read on a regular basis. I do not agree with every story posted on the site.
Regards,
This is from the same "anonymous" - sorry to be so circumspect. I certainly agree that your coverage is comprehensive. I guess my comment was largely an issue of editorial policy rather than upon the article itself.
As for the site, please continue, your work is great and has provided ample warning to those who read and think.
Cheers!
Post a Comment
<< Home